SAVE THE ENVIRONMENT FOR YOUR CHILDREN AND THEIR GENERATIONS TO COME FROM THE GREEDY DEVELOPERS LIKE ZIGGI WILF & BRAIN DAMAGED CORRUPT POLITICIANS OF SPRINGFIELD & UNION COUNTY. "KNOW YOURSELF, KNOW YOUR ENEMY, AND YOU NEED NOT FEAR ONE THOUSAND BATTLES." SUN TZU

Friday, May 11, 2007

WILF'S FRAUDULANT PLAN TO BLOW UP HILL

ANALYSIS OF ZYGMUNT WILF’S FRUDULANT PLAN:

Maximum 16 units to an acre are not norms,
in the proximate vicinity Troy Village on 37.95 Acres with 342 Condominiums has a density of 9.01 units per acre, Summit Hill on 22.85 Acres with 228 Apartments has a density of 9.98 Acres. Both of them have no living quarters above second floor and no third floor.

On the issue of Building Coverage of 14% dishonestly he is not counting Retaining Walls which are attached to the Building becomes part of the Building. There can not be any Building without them because there is no way the earth around this building can be held together to prevent it from erosion and slipping.

“Safety of the Retaining Walls and of Construction in Critical Slope Areas: Retaining Walls are part of the Structure. “Project disrupts so much of Critical Area and proposed Retaining Walls that are too high to be safe and the disturbance of the Critical Slope may lead to erosion and deterioration of the Site.” There should be calculations on GLOBAL STABILITY of Retaining Walls. Mr. Horowitz on Global Stability: the term Global Stability refers to a more massive failure to the entire Hill that would go below the walls and cause the entire slope and wall to fail with that. (BRUCE PITMAN & LEE, SEP. 6, 2000)

COUNSEL PITMAN & PLANNER BURGIS NEVER PRESENTED THE CALCULATIONS ON GLOBAL STABILITY FOR THE RETAINING WALLS ON BEHALF OF K & K DEVELOPERS & ZYGMUNT WILF IN 2005.

The impervious coverage:
is 56.1% not including the access to built Retaining Walls, dishonestly he is not calculating Drive Ways, Retaining Walls and Storm Water Basin. This is in violation of town ordinance of 50% maximum coverage.

This Project is covering 95% of the non-critical area of the lot without taking into account the access area needed to built those Retaining Walls, which is in violation to the CRITCAL SLOPE AREA ordinance, “In addition to the Lot Coverage requirements of this ordinance, no development shall provide more then 80% lot coverage of the non-critical area of the Lot.”

Then he is calculating the height dishonestly from the front yard of the proposed Building. WHEREAS: Front Lot line in accordance with Springfield Ordinance is the Line that follows the right of way of the street that the Lot fronts on. In this case it will be Sunpike Rd. and Wilson Rd. So that right of way line will be front Lot line and the front setback will be measured off that right of way line from Wilson Rd. & Shunpike Rd. “THE BUILDING HEIGHT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ORDINANCE IS MEASURED FROM THE HEIGHEST POINT OF THE BUILDING TO THE GROUND ELEVATION ON THE BOTTOM OF THAT BUILDING WALL.”
(BRUCE PITMAN & LEE JULY 5, 2000)

“According to Pitman & Lee definition the Building height is 45.5 Feet, which is in violation of town ordinance of 35 feet height. Then it is 90 Feet of Vertical Elevation from bottom of the Retaining Wall to the top of the Building.” According to Counsel Pitman “Board is wrong in not referring this matter to the Zoning Board of Adjustment for them, whether or not Variance would be granted.” Sep. 6, 2000

“DENSITY OF 3 STOREYS IS ONLY JUSTIFIED FOR ECONOMIC REASONS TO THE BUILDER. THERE HAS BEEN NO MINIMIZATION OF CONSTRUCTION ON THE CRITICAL SLOPE AREAS, SOME AREAS COMPRISE 85-90 FEET FROM BOTTOM OF THE RETAINING WALL TO THE TOP OF THE ROOF AND CHARACTERIZED THE APPEARANCE OF SAME AS EQUIVALENT TO AN EIGHT STOREY BUILDING.”
BRUCE PITMAN Sep. 6, 2000

Intrusions in to the Steep Slopes: Again Burgis is misrepresenting.
As per the old Ordinance, “There shall be no building within CRITICAL SLOPES area.” K & K Developers, Inc. can not build any thing on this land. Even as per Modified Ordinance, “The Location of the principal or accessory structure in CRITICAL SLOPES AREA shall be MINIMIZED to the greatest extent practical and shall be pursuant to all State and Federal Regulations. According to this honestly a Board can give 10-15 single storey units for Zygmunt Wilf to build on this particular land maintaining its natural character. Master Plan 1997 recommendations for Zoning Land Use Ordinance:
“YOU COULD NOT HAVE ANY LEEVAY WITH THE STEEP SLOPES.”
“IN SOME CASES (STEEP SLOPES) WHAT THE ENGINEER CHUCK LEE CALLED 100% ALMOST STRAIGHT UP AND DOWN, DOWN AND UP. THEY ARE BEING CUT AWAY, YOU ARE BUILDING ON IT, YOU ARE BUILDING OVER THE CRITICAL SLOPE AREA. IF THIS IS GRANTED YOU (BOARD) ARE TOTALLY AND COMPLETELY DISREGARDING THAT
(CRITICAL SLOPE AREAS ORDINANCE)” BRUCE PITMAN, SEP. 6, 2000

CONCLUSION AS PER COUNSEL BRUCE PITMAN: PLANNER JOSEPH BURGIS & DEVELOPER ZYGMUNT WILF’S PLAN TO DEVELOP LOT 26 & 27 BLOCK 1105 IN SPRINGFIELD IS NOT AT ALL SOUND BY ANY STANDARDS. IT IS ANTI-ENVIRONMENT AND ANTI-RESIDENTS. THIS PROJECT WILL BE DETRIMENTAL TO PUBLIC GOOD AND SUBSTANTIALLY IMPAIR THE INTENT & PURPOSE OF THE ZONE PLAN AND THE ZONING ORDINANCE.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home