SAVE THE ENVIRONMENT FOR YOUR CHILDREN AND THEIR GENERATIONS TO COME FROM THE GREEDY DEVELOPERS LIKE ZIGGI WILF & BRAIN DAMAGED CORRUPT POLITICIANS OF SPRINGFIELD & UNION COUNTY. "KNOW YOURSELF, KNOW YOUR ENEMY, AND YOU NEED NOT FEAR ONE THOUSAND BATTLES." SUN TZU

Friday, May 18, 2007

WILF'S COUNSEL "NO CONSTRUCTION ON CRITICAL SLOPES"

IN 2000 BRUCE PITMAN WAS REPRESENTING THE RESIDENTS OF BALTURSOL WAY AGAINST A BUILDER.
IN 2005 BRUCE PITMAN WAS REPRESENTING BUILDER ZYGMUNT WILF AGAINST THE RESIDENTS FOR THE SAME LAND IN FRONT OF THE SAME BOARD MEMBER. DO’T YOU THINK IT IS CONFLICT OF INTERSET AND BOARD SHOULD NOT HAVE ALLOWED HIM?
BRUCE PITMAN ESQ. MAKING A STATEMENT ON THE NATURE OF LAND IN LOT 26 & 27 BLOCK 1105 on Sep. 6, 2000
“If it (development) is granted, it’s going to establish a number of precedents and problems that this town will have to live with for a long time. You are going to have a structure 90 feet high not permitted under your ordinance, wholesale destruction of natural trees, green acres et cetera. What Mr. Marshall pointed out, you are establishing a precedent of massive INVASION INTO CRITICAL SLOPE AREA. Your ordinance that said, “There shall be no building in Critical Slope Area, shall be limited to which is minimally practical. If you allow 50% of the structure in Critical Slope Area it really violates even your existing ordinance.”

THE CRITICAL SLOPE ISSUE IS PROBABLY THE MOST MAJOR ISSUE ON THIS PROJECT. Your ordinance says that Building in the Critical Slope is to be Limited to the extent practical. If you allow ….then what’s big deal about Critical Slope Area? Why do we have any ordinance about it anyway? Is it meaningless, you have Critical Slopes in some cases what the Engineer called 100% almost straight up and down. They are being cut away, you are building on it, you are building over the Critical Slope Areas. If this is granted you are totally and completely disregarding that. Get rid of your Critical Slope paragraph, just get rid of it, you do not need it. It is absolutely okay to build not minimally, not to the extent practical but substantially within the Critical Slope Areas. If there is a disaster like Marc Marshall says there could be. That will happen five or ten or fifteen years from now. None of us will be around. If there was a purpose to the Critical Slope Areas as I understand it. There is a clear purpose for Critical Slope Areas. Then how can you permit 50-55% structures to be built in Critical Slope Areas? THIS WILL BE CLEAR VIOLATION OF CRITICAL SLOPE AREAS ORDINANCE.”
FOR ON GOING MASSIVE DESTRUCTION TO THE HILL AND THE SLOPES AROUND IT USE THE LINK BELOW TO SEE PICTURES:

FOR PICTURES
http://eshare.hpphoto.com/FilmStripHome.aspx?JobID=e6a11778-aca2-4904-80f6-f01b3e3a3290&IDKey=0&SKU=HP&isflag=ExternalLink&st=0&issku

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home